The Accidental Legacy of Captain Charles Boycott

In 1832, Charles Cunningham Boycott’s life started with a mistake.

His parents’ surname was “Boycatt” but his birth certificate said “Boycott.”

So Boycott it was, and the family changed their name to match when he was nine. This was well before the word “boycott” entered the English language.

Charles’ father, the Reverend William Boycott, was a clergyman of the Church of England in Burgh St. Peter, Norfolk.

Though the Boycotts were a typical middle class family, Charles was given a formal education that prepared him for military service and administration. He pursued a career in the British Army and went to the Royal Military Academy in Woolwich.

However, he wasn’t at the Academy for long. After failing a periodic exam, he was discharged.

His family bought him a commission as an officer in the 39th Regiment of Foot, which was almost immediately moved to Ireland. He was stationed in Belfast, then Newry, then 60 miles south to Dublin. They got there by marching.

He reached the rank of captain but his military career wasn’t distinguished one way or the other, except that he was sick during 1851 and 1852. The nature of his illness isn’t clear, but Ireland was still recovering from the Great Famine and tuberculosis was prevalent.

He resigned his commission, married an Irish woman, and leased a farm from the Earl of Erne on Achill Island, just several hundred feet off the west coast.

Given the rocky soil and harsh weather conditions, farming was challenging, and the land was not highly productive. 

He also employed local laborers. Which became a source of tension when he later became the Earl’s land agent, enforcing rent collection and evictions. He had a few squabbles with the residents, some of which were settled out of court and some weren’t. There were threats of violence, but only threats as far as we know.

The Earl owned over 40,000 acres of land across Ireland, and Boycott moved to Lough Mask in 1873 to work as the lord’s land agent there.

Boycott was responsible for collecting rents from tenant farmers, enforcing evictions, and overseeing the management of the Earl’s land.

The land system in Ireland at the time was deeply inequitable, and the Earl of Erne was but one of 750 who together owned half the country.

All over Ireland, large estates were owned by English and Anglo-Irish landlords, managed by their land agents, and worked by Irish tenant farmers who had little to no security over their livelihoods and homes. This led to deep resentment among the workers.

Boycott’s role as an enforcer of the owner’s interests made him deeply unpopular.

It didn’t help that he was English, but what was worse is that he believed that the upper classes deserved to be treated as superior beings, and to hell with everyone else. It’s no wonder the tenants didn’t like him. After 20 years on Achill, he may have been used to it.

Ireland’s economy worsened by the end of the decade, leading to widespread hardship among tenant farmers.

In response, Michael Davitt, with the backing of Member of Parliament Charles Stewart Parnell, started the Irish Land League.

Davitt was a journalist and belonged to the Irish Republican Brotherhood, a secret organization working to make Ireland an “independent democratic republic.”

Realizing he could reach farmers through land rights issues, he created the Irish Land League to campaign for fair rent, secure tenure, and land ownership rights for Irish tenants. The movement sought to resist high rents and evictions.

In 1880, the situation between Boycott and the local tenants reached a fever pitch.

When tenants on the Earl’s estate demanded rent reductions due to poor harvests, Boycott refused. In response, the Irish Land League organized a peaceful but highly effective campaign of social ostracism against Boycott. This included:

• Shunning him socially 
• Local businesses refusing to serve him.
• Preventing others from helping him (even the postman wouldn’t deliver his mail)
• And perhaps most importantly, refusing to work for him so the crops would rot and Lord Erne would lose his investment

Nothing gets a rich man’s attention like losing money.

This complete economic and social isolation made it impossible for Boycott to continue his duties as a land agent. Lord Erne agreed to a 10% reduction in rent, but the tenants demanded 25%.

When they didn’t pay at all, Boycott brought in a process server protected by 17 constables, who were run out of town after being pelted with rocks and manure by the townswomen.

That was the extent of any violence through the entire episode.

In October 1880, Boycott wrote a letter to The Times, the London newspaper, describing how his blacksmith, laundress, postman, and others had been threatened with violence by members of the Irish Land League.

He mentioned his crops would go to waste. 

The Times sent a reporter and it was suddenly news all over the world. Some newspapers and other groups raised money to help Boycott harvest his crops. By that time, Boycott had harvested the grain himself. Four troops of light infantry arrived to protect 50 loyalist workers from Ulster to pick the remaining crops, though Boycott said himself that 15 would have been enough.

The troops, workers, and other expenses cost at least £10,000 to harvest about £500 worth of potatoes.

The events surrounding Boycott’s isolation were widely reported in the British and Irish press.

Soon, the word “boycott” entered the English language as a term for organized social and economic exclusion. The first recorded use of the word in print appeared in The Times in November 1880. The following month, Boycott left Ireland for England, effectively conceding defeat.

He moved to Suffolk where he tried to continue working as a land agent, though he never regained his previous level of power. Later, he settled in Flixton, Norfolk, and lived a relatively quiet life.

Despite his role in history, Boycott did not seek public attention. He remained bitter about his experience in Ireland, believing himself to be a victim rather than a symbol of oppression. He died on June 19, 1897, at the age of 65.

Although Boycott was a minor figure in Irish history, his name became immortalized due to the powerful protest method used against him.

The word “boycott” quickly gained popularity and was later adopted internationally to describe similar forms of nonviolent resistance, protest, and economic pressure. Today, it’s used worldwide to refer to organized refusals to engage with businesses, governments, or individuals for ethical, political, or economic reasons.

Boycott’s legacy has little to do with his own actions and everything to do with the effectiveness of collective resistance. His story is a great example of how ordinary people can challenge economic and social power through peaceful means.

Boycotts are an effective tool to use against powers motivated by money whenever they overstep their rightful boundaries. 

Which, in 2025:

Is every day.

Let the author know that you liked their article with a “Green Thumb” Up

Views: 57